Thirty-Five Million Poor Hearing Little About Themselves in Campaigns
By Patricia Zapor
Catholic News Service
8/12/04
WASHINGTON (CNS) -- Try typing the word "poverty" into the search
functions of the Web sites for the presidential campaigns of President
George W. Bush and Sen. John F. Kerry and it might seem as though it's only
a problem in other, distant parts of the world.
While both candidates talk all the time about how they intend to
improve the economic situations of middle-class voters, neither so far has
devoted much campaign effort to the problems of the 35 million Americans
living below the poverty line.
When Kerry or Bush mentions the word poverty in stump speeches, it's
usually in references to fighting poverty to prevent terrorism, or as a
strategy in combating HIV/AIDS internationally.
"I'm not thrilled with either party's take on addressing poverty," said
Jesuit Father Thomas Massaro, a moral theology professor at Weston
Jesuit School of Theology in Cambridge, Mass., and author of the1998 book,
"Catholic Social Teaching and U.S. Welfare Reform."
Although both candidates emphasize their plans to improve the financial
lot of the middle class, he said, "nobody's talking about upward
mobility for the poorest people, about people at the bottom of the job
market."
Father Massaro said both campaigns are responding to the political
reality that "the poor don't vote," or at least, not in significant enough
numbers to make their concerns a priority.
"They're not a visible population," he said. "They're not
well-organized."
He said Bush's policies, which the Republican describes as providing
tax relief to stimulate the economy, are "all trickle-down economics.
It's much more 'conservative' than it is 'compassionate.'"
Kerry, the Democratic nominee, comes closer to policies that actually
address poverty, the priest said. "He keeps talking about the lower
middle class, and that's great," said Father Massaro. "The Democratic
platform talks about raising the minimum wage to $7 an hour and that's
great. But they're not talking about the 'welfare poor.'"
During his primary campaign and his nomination acceptance speech,
Kerry's running mate, Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, talked regularly
about "the two Americas," where different rules and benefits apply
depending upon one's income level. It hasn't been clear whether Kerry
intends to adopt Edwards' focus on the poor. His campaign staff says yes,
but the topic hasn't made it into Kerry's speeches.
Father Massaro said that, while between 20 percent and 30 percent of
welfare recipients who have left the system "really are better off,"
another 30 percent to 40 percent are what he called "welfare cyclers." They
find themselves in and out of the labor market, with welfare filling in
the gaps. They have new job training or volunteer work requirements to
meet, but their lives are not improving, he said.
The remaining 20 percent to 30 percent of welfare recipients "are the
ones nobody is talking about," according to Father Massaro. They've been
unable to get or hold jobs despite incentives to leave welfare and
still need government support to survive, he said.
The Catholic Campaign for Human Development's Poverty USA project notes
that the number of Americans living below the poverty level has
increased by 3 million since 2000. That included 600,000 more people living in
"severe poverty," for a total of more than 14 million people getting by
on less than $4,600 a year, half the poverty level for a one-person
household.
About one of every three people in the country was poor enough for at
least two months of the year to be classified as living in poverty,
according to CCHD data from the Census Bureau. In 2004, the poverty level
for a household of three was an income of $15,670 a year, according to
the Department of Health and Human Services.
A 2001 study by Network, a Catholic social justice lobby, found that a
third of people taking advantage of soup kitchens and other charitable
food programs had incomes above the federal poverty level. Of those,
three-quarters were former welfare recipients who couldn't make ends meet
in low-paying jobs without benefits.
"Faithful Citizenship: A Catholic Call to Political Responsibility,"
the U.S. bishops' quadrennial statement about how contemporary political
issues relate to Catholic teachings, says a fundamental measure of
society "is how we care for and stand with the poor and vulnerable."
It talks about the need for a living wage and encourages reducing
poverty and dependency by providing job training, child-care assistance,
health care, affordable housing and other forms of aid such as the Earned
Income Tax Credit. It also said U.S. agricultural policy should have
the goal of "food security for all," and encourages support for food
stamps, the federal nutrition program for Women, Infants and Children, and
other programs.
For Catholic social development activists, those goals translate into
legislative efforts including: raising the minimum wage; increasing
child-care subsidies for poor workers and people leaving welfare; fully
funding housing programs; and providing nutrition vouchers and food stamps
to immigrants and all others who are eligible.
Kerry supports raising the minimum wage from the current $5.15 to $7 an
hour by 2007. Bush has said he fears an increase would price people out
of jobs but that he might support a small increase in the minimum wage
as long as states could choose to set their minimums lower.
On housing, the Bush administration has proposed turning the federal
voucher program into a block grant to states, saying the change will give
states flexibility they have sought. The administration's budget
request for 2005 would fund the voucher program at a level $1.6 billion below
what would be needed to cover all the vouchers currently in use,
according to a Network analysis. That would mean 250,000 fewer vouchers for
low-income families.
Kerry opposes the proposed cuts in voucher funding and other housing
programs. His campaign Web site notes his support in the Senate of
various bills to expand housing assistance through additional vouchers for
people with AIDS and to allow housing authorities to increase subsidies
in markets where rents are rising.
The five-year mandate for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
expired two years ago, but Congress has been unable to approve a
reauthorization bill.
Bush's proposal for reauthorization called for continuing child-care
subsidies for welfare recipients at the $2.7 billion level funded for
2003. The version of the bill pending in the Senate includes an amendment
to add $6 billion for child-care programs for parents who are leaving
TANF. The administration argues that additional funding is unnecessary.
The administration also supports increases in the number of hours a
week TANF recipients would be required to work or be in job training, and
in the number of participants required to work. The U.S. Conference of
Catholic Bishops has opposed those proposals.
Kerry, who voted for the 1996 TANF law, opposed efforts in Congress to
cut welfare spending by $65 billion and has supported bills to more
fully fund child-care programs for welfare participants, and to provide
more job training before welfare recipients are required to leave the
program.
On food programs and other low-income supports, the Center on Budget
and Policy Priorities reported that Bush administration budget
projections call for cuts in domestic discretionary programs including the Women,
Infants and Children nutrition program, energy assistance funds and
child-care subsidies over the next five years. The cuts would amount to
$122 million less for WIC, for instance, meaning 18,300 fewer
participants.
Kerry has called for full funding of WIC and other discretionary
programs with spending caps to ensure such expenditures do not exceed the
rate of inflation. The cap would not apply to defense, education and
mandatory programs such as Social Security.
Bush signed legislation to expand the child tax credit from $600 to
$1,000 per child. The law did not, however, include single parents with
income under $6,000 a year or couples who make less than $12,000. The
USCCB, Catholic Charities USA and other advocacy organizations have pushed
to expand the credit to the poorest families.
Kerry has sponsored and voted for legislation to expand the credit to
allow another 16 million lower-income families to participate.
END
Catholic News Service
8/12/04
WASHINGTON (CNS) -- Try typing the word "poverty" into the search
functions of the Web sites for the presidential campaigns of President
George W. Bush and Sen. John F. Kerry and it might seem as though it's only
a problem in other, distant parts of the world.
While both candidates talk all the time about how they intend to
improve the economic situations of middle-class voters, neither so far has
devoted much campaign effort to the problems of the 35 million Americans
living below the poverty line.
When Kerry or Bush mentions the word poverty in stump speeches, it's
usually in references to fighting poverty to prevent terrorism, or as a
strategy in combating HIV/AIDS internationally.
"I'm not thrilled with either party's take on addressing poverty," said
Jesuit Father Thomas Massaro, a moral theology professor at Weston
Jesuit School of Theology in Cambridge, Mass., and author of the1998 book,
"Catholic Social Teaching and U.S. Welfare Reform."
Although both candidates emphasize their plans to improve the financial
lot of the middle class, he said, "nobody's talking about upward
mobility for the poorest people, about people at the bottom of the job
market."
Father Massaro said both campaigns are responding to the political
reality that "the poor don't vote," or at least, not in significant enough
numbers to make their concerns a priority.
"They're not a visible population," he said. "They're not
well-organized."
He said Bush's policies, which the Republican describes as providing
tax relief to stimulate the economy, are "all trickle-down economics.
It's much more 'conservative' than it is 'compassionate.'"
Kerry, the Democratic nominee, comes closer to policies that actually
address poverty, the priest said. "He keeps talking about the lower
middle class, and that's great," said Father Massaro. "The Democratic
platform talks about raising the minimum wage to $7 an hour and that's
great. But they're not talking about the 'welfare poor.'"
During his primary campaign and his nomination acceptance speech,
Kerry's running mate, Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, talked regularly
about "the two Americas," where different rules and benefits apply
depending upon one's income level. It hasn't been clear whether Kerry
intends to adopt Edwards' focus on the poor. His campaign staff says yes,
but the topic hasn't made it into Kerry's speeches.
Father Massaro said that, while between 20 percent and 30 percent of
welfare recipients who have left the system "really are better off,"
another 30 percent to 40 percent are what he called "welfare cyclers." They
find themselves in and out of the labor market, with welfare filling in
the gaps. They have new job training or volunteer work requirements to
meet, but their lives are not improving, he said.
The remaining 20 percent to 30 percent of welfare recipients "are the
ones nobody is talking about," according to Father Massaro. They've been
unable to get or hold jobs despite incentives to leave welfare and
still need government support to survive, he said.
The Catholic Campaign for Human Development's Poverty USA project notes
that the number of Americans living below the poverty level has
increased by 3 million since 2000. That included 600,000 more people living in
"severe poverty," for a total of more than 14 million people getting by
on less than $4,600 a year, half the poverty level for a one-person
household.
About one of every three people in the country was poor enough for at
least two months of the year to be classified as living in poverty,
according to CCHD data from the Census Bureau. In 2004, the poverty level
for a household of three was an income of $15,670 a year, according to
the Department of Health and Human Services.
A 2001 study by Network, a Catholic social justice lobby, found that a
third of people taking advantage of soup kitchens and other charitable
food programs had incomes above the federal poverty level. Of those,
three-quarters were former welfare recipients who couldn't make ends meet
in low-paying jobs without benefits.
"Faithful Citizenship: A Catholic Call to Political Responsibility,"
the U.S. bishops' quadrennial statement about how contemporary political
issues relate to Catholic teachings, says a fundamental measure of
society "is how we care for and stand with the poor and vulnerable."
It talks about the need for a living wage and encourages reducing
poverty and dependency by providing job training, child-care assistance,
health care, affordable housing and other forms of aid such as the Earned
Income Tax Credit. It also said U.S. agricultural policy should have
the goal of "food security for all," and encourages support for food
stamps, the federal nutrition program for Women, Infants and Children, and
other programs.
For Catholic social development activists, those goals translate into
legislative efforts including: raising the minimum wage; increasing
child-care subsidies for poor workers and people leaving welfare; fully
funding housing programs; and providing nutrition vouchers and food stamps
to immigrants and all others who are eligible.
Kerry supports raising the minimum wage from the current $5.15 to $7 an
hour by 2007. Bush has said he fears an increase would price people out
of jobs but that he might support a small increase in the minimum wage
as long as states could choose to set their minimums lower.
On housing, the Bush administration has proposed turning the federal
voucher program into a block grant to states, saying the change will give
states flexibility they have sought. The administration's budget
request for 2005 would fund the voucher program at a level $1.6 billion below
what would be needed to cover all the vouchers currently in use,
according to a Network analysis. That would mean 250,000 fewer vouchers for
low-income families.
Kerry opposes the proposed cuts in voucher funding and other housing
programs. His campaign Web site notes his support in the Senate of
various bills to expand housing assistance through additional vouchers for
people with AIDS and to allow housing authorities to increase subsidies
in markets where rents are rising.
The five-year mandate for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
expired two years ago, but Congress has been unable to approve a
reauthorization bill.
Bush's proposal for reauthorization called for continuing child-care
subsidies for welfare recipients at the $2.7 billion level funded for
2003. The version of the bill pending in the Senate includes an amendment
to add $6 billion for child-care programs for parents who are leaving
TANF. The administration argues that additional funding is unnecessary.
The administration also supports increases in the number of hours a
week TANF recipients would be required to work or be in job training, and
in the number of participants required to work. The U.S. Conference of
Catholic Bishops has opposed those proposals.
Kerry, who voted for the 1996 TANF law, opposed efforts in Congress to
cut welfare spending by $65 billion and has supported bills to more
fully fund child-care programs for welfare participants, and to provide
more job training before welfare recipients are required to leave the
program.
On food programs and other low-income supports, the Center on Budget
and Policy Priorities reported that Bush administration budget
projections call for cuts in domestic discretionary programs including the Women,
Infants and Children nutrition program, energy assistance funds and
child-care subsidies over the next five years. The cuts would amount to
$122 million less for WIC, for instance, meaning 18,300 fewer
participants.
Kerry has called for full funding of WIC and other discretionary
programs with spending caps to ensure such expenditures do not exceed the
rate of inflation. The cap would not apply to defense, education and
mandatory programs such as Social Security.
Bush signed legislation to expand the child tax credit from $600 to
$1,000 per child. The law did not, however, include single parents with
income under $6,000 a year or couples who make less than $12,000. The
USCCB, Catholic Charities USA and other advocacy organizations have pushed
to expand the credit to the poorest families.
Kerry has sponsored and voted for legislation to expand the credit to
allow another 16 million lower-income families to participate.
END
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home