Iraq: Bush’s Watergate?
Half million demand answers on Downing Street Memo
The “Downing Street Memo” could be the last straw, or the spark that lights a fire, for an American public fed up with the Iraq war.
As incriminating documents continue to be revealed showing the Bush administration lied to take the U.S. to war, and as the U.S. death toll in Iraq topped 1,700, more than half a million Americans have signed a letter initiated by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) demanding that President Bush answer charges his administration “fixed” intelligence to sell the war. “We’re now 540,000 and counting,” Conyers said in his blog June 13.
The secret memo, published May 1 by the Times of London, reports minutes of a July 23, 2002, meeting of top British officials including Prime Minister Tony Blair. According to the memo, the head of Britain’s intelligence agency, just back from meetings in Washington, reported that “the intelligence and facts were being fixed” to justify Bush’s determination to attack Iraq.
Conyers, the House Judiciary Committee’s ranking Democrat, said he would personally deliver the signatures to the White House June 16, following a hearing by committee Democrats on the issue. Scheduled witnesses included former ambassador Joseph Wilson and former CIA analyst Ray McGovern.
In a Gallup Poll released June 13, nearly 6 in 10 Americans said the U.S. should withdraw some or all troops from Iraq, and, for the first time, a majority would be “upset” if Bush sends more troops.
Reflecting that sentiment, a 32-9 bipartisan vote in the House International Relations Committee June 9 approved an amendment asking the administration for “a plan” that will “allow the U.S. presence to be diminished.” The measure was sponsored by Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.), who had voted to authorize war in 2002.
On June 12 conservative Republican Congressman Walter Jones, representing eastern North Carolina, told ABC’s “This Week” the U.S. should set a date to withdraw from Iraq. He is part of a bipartisan group that is introducing legislation in the House setting a timetable for a pullout. A similar measure has been introduced in the Senate by Democrat Russ Feingold (Wis.).
Jones, who invented the term “freedom fries” to slam the French for opposing the Iraq war, voted for the war in 2002. He said he began changing his mind after attending the funeral of a U.S. servicemember killed in Iraq.
Celeste Zappala, whose son Sherwood Baker was killed in Iraq on April 26, 2004, was one of a group of Gold Star Families for Peace who met with Jones May 26. Jones appeared “sincerely stricken by the losses suffered, and by his part in it,” Zappala told the World.
The Downing Street Memo is “a terrible and sad confirmation of what I’ve believed all along,” she said. “It puts an official stamp on what everyone knows: This war is a disaster. Not only is it not worth it, but it’s built on a fabric of lies.”
Zappala sees a growing feeling on Capitol Hill that the war in Iraq is “a terrible, terrible situation and we need to get out of there.” In her view, the memo “enables centrists — those who have a conscience — to say, ‘Wait a minute! I’ve been misled.’”
Zappala was to join other Gold Star families July 15 in Washington, lobbying both Democrats and Republicans.
“I believe in democracy,” she said. “People can be called to conscience.”
So far, more than 100 members of Congress have joined Conyers in asking Bush to answer questions about the Downing Street Memo.
On June 12, the Times of London published another secret British document, a July 21, 2002, Cabinet Office briefing paper for participants in the July 23 meeting. Acknowledging that “regime change per se is not a proper basis for military action under international law,” the leaked paper advocated “creating the conditions necessary to justify government military actions.”
Times reporter Michael Smith notes the briefing paper’s “damaging revelation” that Bush and Blair had agreed on military action for “regime change” as early as April 2002, contradicting Bush’s claims he was trying to avoid war.
A coalition of veterans’, peace and political groups has begun a campaign to urge that Congress launch a formal investigation into whether President Bush has committed impeachable offenses in connection with the Iraq war, focusing on evidence in the Downing Street Memo. The coalition, AfterDowningStreet.org, includes Gold Star Families for Peace, Veterans for Peace, Progressive Democrats of America, Code Pink and Rainbow/PUSH.
Progressive Democrats says the memo “provides new and compelling evidence that the President of the United States has been actively engaged in a conspiracy to deceive and mislead the United States Congress and the American people about the basis for going to war against Iraq. If true, such conduct constitutes a High Crime under Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution.”
The Downing Street exposés come as revelation of the identity of Watergate’s “Deep Throat” brought renewed attention to the downfall of Richard Nixon soon after he won re-election.
Conyers told the Times of London that its role in bringing the Iraq-related documents to light “reminds me of Watergate, which started off as a tiny little incident reported in The Washington Post. I think that the interest of many citizens is picking up.”
Susan Webb
Original - http://www.pww.org/article/view/7225/
The “Downing Street Memo” could be the last straw, or the spark that lights a fire, for an American public fed up with the Iraq war.
As incriminating documents continue to be revealed showing the Bush administration lied to take the U.S. to war, and as the U.S. death toll in Iraq topped 1,700, more than half a million Americans have signed a letter initiated by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) demanding that President Bush answer charges his administration “fixed” intelligence to sell the war. “We’re now 540,000 and counting,” Conyers said in his blog June 13.
The secret memo, published May 1 by the Times of London, reports minutes of a July 23, 2002, meeting of top British officials including Prime Minister Tony Blair. According to the memo, the head of Britain’s intelligence agency, just back from meetings in Washington, reported that “the intelligence and facts were being fixed” to justify Bush’s determination to attack Iraq.
Conyers, the House Judiciary Committee’s ranking Democrat, said he would personally deliver the signatures to the White House June 16, following a hearing by committee Democrats on the issue. Scheduled witnesses included former ambassador Joseph Wilson and former CIA analyst Ray McGovern.
In a Gallup Poll released June 13, nearly 6 in 10 Americans said the U.S. should withdraw some or all troops from Iraq, and, for the first time, a majority would be “upset” if Bush sends more troops.
Reflecting that sentiment, a 32-9 bipartisan vote in the House International Relations Committee June 9 approved an amendment asking the administration for “a plan” that will “allow the U.S. presence to be diminished.” The measure was sponsored by Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.), who had voted to authorize war in 2002.
On June 12 conservative Republican Congressman Walter Jones, representing eastern North Carolina, told ABC’s “This Week” the U.S. should set a date to withdraw from Iraq. He is part of a bipartisan group that is introducing legislation in the House setting a timetable for a pullout. A similar measure has been introduced in the Senate by Democrat Russ Feingold (Wis.).
Jones, who invented the term “freedom fries” to slam the French for opposing the Iraq war, voted for the war in 2002. He said he began changing his mind after attending the funeral of a U.S. servicemember killed in Iraq.
Celeste Zappala, whose son Sherwood Baker was killed in Iraq on April 26, 2004, was one of a group of Gold Star Families for Peace who met with Jones May 26. Jones appeared “sincerely stricken by the losses suffered, and by his part in it,” Zappala told the World.
The Downing Street Memo is “a terrible and sad confirmation of what I’ve believed all along,” she said. “It puts an official stamp on what everyone knows: This war is a disaster. Not only is it not worth it, but it’s built on a fabric of lies.”
Zappala sees a growing feeling on Capitol Hill that the war in Iraq is “a terrible, terrible situation and we need to get out of there.” In her view, the memo “enables centrists — those who have a conscience — to say, ‘Wait a minute! I’ve been misled.’”
Zappala was to join other Gold Star families July 15 in Washington, lobbying both Democrats and Republicans.
“I believe in democracy,” she said. “People can be called to conscience.”
So far, more than 100 members of Congress have joined Conyers in asking Bush to answer questions about the Downing Street Memo.
On June 12, the Times of London published another secret British document, a July 21, 2002, Cabinet Office briefing paper for participants in the July 23 meeting. Acknowledging that “regime change per se is not a proper basis for military action under international law,” the leaked paper advocated “creating the conditions necessary to justify government military actions.”
Times reporter Michael Smith notes the briefing paper’s “damaging revelation” that Bush and Blair had agreed on military action for “regime change” as early as April 2002, contradicting Bush’s claims he was trying to avoid war.
A coalition of veterans’, peace and political groups has begun a campaign to urge that Congress launch a formal investigation into whether President Bush has committed impeachable offenses in connection with the Iraq war, focusing on evidence in the Downing Street Memo. The coalition, AfterDowningStreet.org, includes Gold Star Families for Peace, Veterans for Peace, Progressive Democrats of America, Code Pink and Rainbow/PUSH.
Progressive Democrats says the memo “provides new and compelling evidence that the President of the United States has been actively engaged in a conspiracy to deceive and mislead the United States Congress and the American people about the basis for going to war against Iraq. If true, such conduct constitutes a High Crime under Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution.”
The Downing Street exposés come as revelation of the identity of Watergate’s “Deep Throat” brought renewed attention to the downfall of Richard Nixon soon after he won re-election.
Conyers told the Times of London that its role in bringing the Iraq-related documents to light “reminds me of Watergate, which started off as a tiny little incident reported in The Washington Post. I think that the interest of many citizens is picking up.”
Susan Webb
Original - http://www.pww.org/article/view/7225/
posted by R7 | 6/18/2005 11:02:00 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home